Confirmation Theory
نویسنده
چکیده
Predictions about the future and unrestricted universal generalizations are never logically implied by our observational evidence, which is limited to particular facts in the present and past. Nevertheless, propositions of these and other kinds are often said to be confirmed by observational evidence. A natural place to begin the study of confirmation theory is to consider what it means to say that some evidence E confirms a hypothesis H.
منابع مشابه
A Synthesis of Hempelian and Hypothetico-Deductive Confirmation
This paper synthesizes confirmation by instances and confirmation by successful predictions, and thereby the Hempelian and the hypotheticodeductive traditions in confirmation theory. Our merger of these two approaches solves classical problems such as the tacking paradoxes and the raven paradox and is subsequently extended to the piecemeal confirmation of entire theories. We compare our proposa...
متن کاملOn the equivalence of Goodman's and Hempel's paradoxes.
Historically, Nelson Goodman's paradox involving the predicates 'grue' and 'bleen' has been taken to furnish a serious blow to Carl Hempel's theory of confirmation in particular and to purely formal theories of confirmation in general. In this paper, I argue that Goodman's paradox is no more serious of a threat to Hempel's theory of confirmation than is Hempel's own paradox of the ravens. I pro...
متن کاملConfirmation Theory
Confirmation theory is the study of the logic by which scientific hypotheses may be confirmed or disconfirmed (or supported or refuted) by evidence. A specific theory of confirmation is a proposal for such a logic. Presumably the epistemic evaluation of scientific hypotheses should largely depend on their empirical content — on what they say the evidentially accessible parts of the world are li...
متن کاملMaking of the Humanities III Humanities ’ new methods : a reconnaissance mission
In comparison to the natural and social sciences, the humanities have received comparatively little attention from analytic philosophy of science. This discipline has been concerned primarily with the sciences narrowly construed. In particular confirmation theory, the systematic study of theory evaluation, shows remarkable lacunas when it comes to the methodology of the humanities. But developm...
متن کاملA Novel Solution to the Problem of Old Evidence
One of the most troubling and persistent challenges for Bayesian Confirmation Theory is the Problem of Old Evidence (POE, Glymour 1980). The problem arises for anyone who wants to model confirmation and theory appraisal in science by means of Bayesian Conditionalization. This paper addresses the problem as follows: First, I clarify the nature and the varieties of the POE, following Eells (1985,...
متن کاملA new foundation for methodological triangulation.
PURPOSE To show how triangulation with qualitative and quantitative methods can help confirm a theory to a greater degree than can either method alone. CONSTRUCT: Coherence view of theory structure and confirmation. Evidence helps confirm a theory if the theory is the most coherent way of accounting for the evidence, and one theory is more coherent than another insofar as it leaves fewer unansw...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1993